{
  "schema_version": "0.1",
  "package_id": "NOTE01-EPKG-001",
  "release_status": "published",
  "claims": [
    {
      "claim_id": "CLAIM-N01-01",
      "description": "A cryptographic commitment preserves the chronology of a representation, not the correctness of its key.",
      "evidence": [
        "NOTE01-E11-KEY",
        "NOTE01-E11-RESULTS",
        "NOTE01-E17-KEY",
        "NOTE01-E17-RESULTS"
      ],
      "support_level": "PRIMARY_AND_CONTEMPORANEOUS",
      "qualification": "E11's provider-native key has a documented serialization incident; E17's sealed first-invalid-step judgment was later contradicted."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "CLAIM-N01-02",
      "description": "Byte serialization rules are part of auditability for a sealed key.",
      "evidence": [
        "NOTE01-E11-RESULTS",
        "NOTE01-E14-KEY",
        "NOTE01-E14-RESULTS",
        "NOTE01-E16-KEY",
        "NOTE01-E16-RESULTS"
      ],
      "support_level": "PRIMARY_AND_CONTEMPORANEOUS",
      "qualification": "E11's mismatch concerns a trailing LF; later rounds use an explicit byte protocol."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "CLAIM-N01-03",
      "description": "An auditor identified genuine defects omitted from the sealed key.",
      "evidence": [
        "NOTE01-E11-KEY",
        "NOTE01-E11-RESULTS",
        "NOTE01-E17-KEY",
        "NOTE01-E17-RESULTS",
        "NOTE01-RELAY-SELECTED-RECORDS"
      ],
      "support_level": "PRIMARY_AND_CONTEMPORANEOUS",
      "qualification": "The public relay support is the bounded selected-record derivative. Full ChatGPT and Claude snapshots are preserved internally but WITHHELD for privacy/relevance. The cross-check covers 43 relevant turns: 37 fully paired with supported chronology; six Claude-side full bodies unavailable due truncated previews. Differences include Jitka relay wrappers and citation/link representation. Post-reveal adjudication was participant-led."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "CLAIM-N01-04",
      "description": "The E18 mirror did not produce the anticipated false positive in the observed run.",
      "evidence": [
        "NOTE01-E18-KEY",
        "NOTE01-E18-RESULTS"
      ],
      "support_level": "PRIMARY_AND_CONTEMPORANEOUS",
      "qualification": "The auditor recognized the mirror design, so the case does not isolate structural discrimination from author-intent inference."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "CLAIM-N01-05",
      "description": "The six-round series is a methodological case note, not a general model reliability benchmark.",
      "evidence": [
        "NOTE01-E11-KEY",
        "NOTE01-E11-RESULTS",
        "NOTE01-E14-KEY",
        "NOTE01-E14-RESULTS",
        "NOTE01-E15-KEY",
        "NOTE01-E15-RESULTS",
        "NOTE01-E16-KEY",
        "NOTE01-E16-RESULTS",
        "NOTE01-E17-KEY",
        "NOTE01-E17-RESULTS",
        "NOTE01-E18-KEY",
        "NOTE01-E18-RESULTS"
      ],
      "support_level": "PRIMARY_AND_CONTEMPORANEOUS",
      "qualification": "Short-round agreement is agreement with sealed keys. The later synthesis is internal SECONDARY_ANALYSIS, WITHHELD from public v1.0; public support rests on the round key/result records."
    }
  ]
}